G. F. Construction, Inc. v. Cherry Hill Construction, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendant, Cherry Hill Construction, Inc., appeals from the order of the trial court granting a motion by the plaintiff, G. F. Construction, Inc., to open a default entered on the defendant’s counterclaim and a judgment of nonsuit rendered on the complaint. The defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion by opening the default and nonsuit and that it lacked authority to open the default and the nonsuit because the plaintiff failed to file affidavits in support of its motion to open within the four month period set forth by General Statutes § 52-2121 and Practice Book §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Home Oil Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Opoku v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Covey v. ComenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Cusano v. Burgundy Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Johnson v. Atlantic Health Services, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Cardona v. NegronConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.