Francis v. Sanders
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWANN, Judge.
¶ 1 Raied Francis (“Petitioner”) brought this special action to challenge the trial court’s denial of his motion to remand the indictment for a redetei’mination of probable cause. We hold that remand was required because the prosecutor interfered with the proper function of the grand jury when he: (1) did not accurately explain the elements of entrapment in response to a question from a grand juror; and (2) incorrectly advised the grand jury that questions pertaining to entrapment were the province of the court or the trial jury, not the grand jury.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Campbell v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Potter v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Brailsford v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Bashir v. PinedaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Sanchez v. AinleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.