Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Ainley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 13, 2013No. 1 CA-SA 13-0060PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Judge.

¶ 1 This special action arises from the trial court’s refusal to conduct a hearing pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 13.5(c) and Chronis v. Steinle, 220 Ariz. 559, 208 P.3d 210 (2009). We accept jurisdiction because the issue raised involves a challenge to grand jury proceedings that will not be reviewable on appeal. State v. Moody, 208 Ariz. 424, 439-40 ¶ 31, 94 P.3d 1119, 1134-35 (2004); Francis v. Sanders, 222 Ariz. 423, 426 ¶ 9, 215 P.3d 397, 400 (App.2009). We decline to grant relief, however, because the trial court did not err in refusing to conduct the hearing.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State of Arizona v. Phil GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. McKaney v. ForemanArizona Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Juan Carlos Vicente Sanchez v. Hon. ainley/state of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Juan Carlos Vicente Sanchez v. Hon. ainley/state of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API