Sanchez v. Ainley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Judge.
¶ 1 This special action arises from the trial court’s refusal to conduct a hearing pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 13.5(c) and Chronis v. Steinle, 220 Ariz. 559, 208 P.3d 210 (2009). We accept jurisdiction because the issue raised involves a challenge to grand jury proceedings that will not be reviewable on appeal. State v. Moody, 208 Ariz. 424, 439-40 ¶ 31, 94 P.3d 1119, 1134-35 (2004); Francis v. Sanders, 222 Ariz. 423, 426 ¶ 9, 215 P.3d 397, 400 (App.2009). We decline to grant relief, however, because the trial court did not err in refusing to conduct the hearing.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State of Arizona v. Phil GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- McKaney v. ForemanArizona Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Juan Carlos Vicente Sanchez v. Hon. ainley/state of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Juan Carlos Vicente Sanchez v. Hon. ainley/state of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014