Legal Opinion

Brailsford v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 14, 2017No. 1 CA-SA 17-0010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McMURDIE, Judge:

¶ 1 Philip Brailsford (“Petitioner”) petitions this Court for special action relief, challenging the magistrate’s finding of probable cause. Petitioner argues the magistrate precluded him from presenting all witnesses related to his justification defenses, thereby denying him due process and entitling him to a new probable cause finding. We accept jurisdiction, but because matters related to a contested justification defense need not be resolved at a preliminary hearing, we deny relief.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 On January 18, 2016, Petitioner, a Mesa police…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. EssmanArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. BojorquezArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Files v. BernalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Crimmins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Kevin William Holland v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
  4. Kevin William Holland v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API