Legal Opinion

State v. Bernini

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 27, 2009No. 2 CA-SA 2009-0062PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The State of Arizona has petitioned this court for special action relief from the respondent judge’s order that it produce software for the Intoxilyzer 8000, the breath-testing equipment currently used by the Tucson Police Department, to real parties in interest, Erica Daughters-White and twenty-seven other defendants (Defendants) charged in these consolidated cases with driving with a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or more. In State v. Bernini, 220 Ariz. 536, ¶¶ 8, 11, 207 P.3d 789, 791-92 (App.2009), we vacated the respondent judge’s order that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Twin City Fire Insurance v. BurkeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. VelascoArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. MacK v. CruikshankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MarinoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State of Arizona v. Kyle Andrew StollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API