Legal Opinion

People v. Lancaster

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1986PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alexander, J.

We hold today that the People are under no obligation to charge the Grand Jury with respect to a potential defense of mental disease or defect, and therefore have no duty to present to the Grand Jury evidence within their possession of defendant’s psychiatric history in support of such a charge.

I

On October 21, 1984, Peter Lancaster, while a patient at the Hutchings Psychiatric Center in Syracuse pursuant to a CPL article 330 commitment order,1 allegedly beat and choked another patient without provocation. Employees at the facility restrained the defendant…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. People v. HustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Matter of George L.New York Court of Appeals · 1995

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API