Legal Opinion
Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S. A. v. Schenley Distillers Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1950No. 12261PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
Upon this appeal, -both the seller Engraw (of Argentina) and the ¡buyer S-chenley (of the Unite-d States) have appealed from a j-u-dgment awarding Engraw damages in the sum o-f $5,845.25 fo-r the breach o-f an alleged contract for the sale f:o.b. Buenos Aires, Argentina, of 1135 tons of glucose, deliveries to -be made in installments -from June to December 1946. Schenley, the alleged buyer, contends that there was no contract between the parties. Engraw contends that there was a contract -but that the lower court failed to award adequate damages for the -breach.
U-pon…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Parker v. HoppeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Richard v. American Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sterling Drug, Inc. v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1954
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Cronel Watch, S.A. v. Peterson State BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S.A. v. Schenley Distillers Corporation. Schenley Distillers Corporation v. Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S.ACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950