Legal Opinion

Cronel Watch, S.A. v. Peterson State Bank

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 12, 1983No. 78 C 4283PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Cronel Watch and Enzo Watch (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Cronel”), bring this action as assignees of Max Jeker (“Jeker”) to recover money owed on the sale of Swiss watches and watch movements by Jeker to Mercantile Products Co., Inc. (“Mercantile”), an Illinois corporation which is now dissolved. The specific basis for this lawsuit was discussed by the court in its Memorandum and Order dated November 19, 1981. 1 Briefly, the watches were received by defendant J.E. Bernard & Co., Inc. (“Bernard”), an Illinois-licensed custom…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Weiland Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hicks v. GuinnessSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. WetzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ingersoll Milling MacHine Co. v. John P. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re GOOD HOPE CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Debtor. Good Hope Chemical Corporation Creditors’ Committee, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API