Legal Opinion

Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Anderson

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 8, 1954No. Civ. 900, 905, 906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

A motion has been filed by defendants to remit plaintiffs to the state courts on questions relating to the Tennessee Fair Trade Law, Code, § 6770.1. Actions were commenced in the three cases for injunctive relief against the selling by defendants of certain of plaintiffs’ trademark-bearing products below retail list prices furnished by plaintiffs. In case No. 900, plaintiff sues, also, for damages. The Sperry and Hutchinson Company intervened as a defendant for the reason that trading stamps furnished by this company allegedly were involved in the cut-rate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Virginia Surety Co. v. Knoxville Transit Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955
  3. Clifton Park Manor, Section One, Inc. v. MasonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  4. County Utilities Corp. v. Hampton Roads Sanitation DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
  5. Upjohn Co. v. Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API