Richard v. American Union Bank
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hiscock, Ch. J.
Judgment has been rendered dismissing the complaint on the ground that it did not set forth a cause of action. It contains two purported causes of action. In the first of these, in addition to necessary formal allegations, the complaint alleges that the plaintiffs made a contract with the defendant’s predecessor, and whose liabilities the defendant has assumed, whereby in consideration of the payment of a substantial sum of money said bank agreed to establish for the benefit of plaintiff in Bucharest a credit for two,million lei by a certain date; that the bank did not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gravenhorst v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Winter v. . American Aniline Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Equitable Trust Co. v. . KeeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by33 opinions
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Competex, S.A. (In Liquidation) v. Ronald LabowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.