Legal Opinion
Parker v. Hoppe
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 1931PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
On August 10, 1917, plaintiff’s assignor, Kamendrovsky, entered into a written contract with the defendant for the purchase of 5,000 poods (approximately eighty-five tons) of Scotch paraffin wax at the price of 24 rubles per pood, c. i. f. Archangel, or 120,000 rubles for the entire purchase. The wax had been purchased by the defendant abroad and was expected at Archangel during the navigation season. Due to climatic conditions as well as international arrangements the contract contained this clause: “A delay in the delivery of the mer cb.an.dise cannot serve as a basis for a refusal on your…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Richard v. American Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Bank of United States v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Newmont Mines Limited and Esso Resources Canada Limited v. Hanover Insurance Company & Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Simon v. Electrospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Brushton-Moira Central School District v. Fred H. Thomas Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Competex, S.A. (In Liquidation) v. Ronald LabowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.