Legal Opinion

Maria Guyton v. Tyson Foods

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2014No. 13-2036PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

Maria Guyton and Dionicio Canuzal are employees of Tyson Foods, Inc. They represent a class of employees at Tyson’s meat-processing facility in Columbus Junction, Iowa. They sued Tyson for not paying wages due under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the Iowa Wage Payment Collection Law (IWPCL), Iowa Code 91A.1 et seq. A jury returned a verdict for Tyson. The employees appeal. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

I

The employees are current and former “gang-time” employees at Tyson’s facility. The background…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Karlson v. Action Process Service & Private Investigations, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. QuanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Castaneda v. JBS USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Pietrzycki v. Heights Tower Serv., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  5. Elliott Gelber v. AKAL Security, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API