Legal Opinion

Weeks v. Angelone

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 19, 2000No. 99-5746PublishedCited by 719 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

This case presents the question whether the Constitution is violated when a trial judge directs a capital jury’s attention to a specific paragraph of a constitutionally sufficient instruction in response to a question regarding the proper consideration of mitigating circumstances. We hold that it is not and that habeas relief is barred by 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d) (1994 ed., Supp. III).

Petitioner Lonnie Weeks, Jr., was riding from Washington, D. C., to Richmond, Virginia, as a passenger in a car driven by his uncle, Lewis Dukes. Petitioner had stolen the vehicle in a home burglary earlier in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Buchanan v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by719 opinions

  1. Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  2. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016

714 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API