Weeks v. Angelone
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
This case presents the question whether the Constitution is violated when a trial judge directs a capital jury’s attention to a specific paragraph of a constitutionally sufficient instruction in response to a question regarding the proper consideration of mitigating circumstances. We hold that it is not and that habeas relief is barred by 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d) (1994 ed., Supp. III).
Petitioner Lonnie Weeks, Jr., was riding from Washington, D. C., to Richmond, Virginia, as a passenger in a car driven by his uncle, Lewis Dukes. Petitioner had stolen the vehicle in a home burglary earlier in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Buchanan v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by719 opinions
- Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
714 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.