Legal Opinion

Belyea v. City of Port Huron

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1904No. Docket No. 3PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to St. Clair; Law, J. Case by William N. Belyea against the city of Port Huron for personal injuries caused by a defective sidewalk. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

The plaintiff recovered for injuries received because of a defective sidewalk..- Its condition was described by one of the witnesses as follows:

‘ ‘ Starting from our place and going east, there is first Mellon’s house, then a vacant lot, and then Allen’s house. *505The vacant lot is between Mellon’s and Allen’s, and is between 40 and 50 feet wide. I recollect that the walk was torn up about the 10th of August. It was torn up by Mr. York. Father was injured about two months and a half after the walk was torn up. Nothing whatever was done to put up guards so as to prevent persons from getting into…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Harris v. Township of ClintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Lowell v. Township of WatertownMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ashman v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Germaine v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hunter v. Village of DurandMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wolverton v. Village of SaranacMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Speck v. Township of BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Sherman v. Consumers' Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API