Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Village of Durand

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1904No. Docket No. 55PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Smith, J. Case by James Hunter against the village of Durand for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

On the evening of October 30, 1898, plaintiff claims that he received injuries by a fall on a defective sidewalk in defendant village. He brought this suit to recover compensation, and secured a verdict and judgment in the court below. Defendant asks us to reverse that judgment for various reasons.

1. It is contended that a verdict should have been directed for defendant because plaintiff did not give the notice required by sections 2754, 2775, 1 Comp. Laws. Plaintiff did on the 28th of November, 1898, give the defendant a notice which in all respects complied with the law, except that it was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Griswold v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Holtham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Levy v. Peabody Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Cornell v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Draper v. Village of SpringwellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of New Decatur v. ChappellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Rawlings v. Clyde Plank & Macadamized Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API