Legal Opinion

Lowell v. Township of Watertown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1885PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Error to Clinton. (V. II. Smith, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This action was brought to recover damages which plaintiff suffered by reason of a defect in a public highway which it was the duty of defendant to keep in repair.

It is conceded that the highway was defective, and that the defendant was negligent in not having repaired tjm same, and that plaintiff was injured by reason of such defect, *569and the only question raised in the record is whether the testimony of plaintiff himself did not show that he was guilty of such contributory negligence as should preclude him from recovering.

This testimony showed that the accident happened on a dark and misty…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Maus v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Meindersee v. MeyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Samples v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API