Ashman v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.
Plaintiff was switching in the yard of defendant at East Saginaw, Mich., June 5, 1890, and received injuries while attempting to uncouple cars. He brings this action for damages, alleging as negligence in the defendant the leaving of a frog unblocked, in which he caught his foot, thereby causing his injury. The defendant introduced no testimony, and plaintiff had verdict and judgment in the circuit court for Bay county.
The plaintiff, according to his own testimony, was in charge of a pony engine, doing switching in the yard of the defendant, and had some men with him, assisting, who were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Johnson v. SpearMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Beems v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- George v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Beach v. City of St. JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Brady v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.