Dundas v. City of Lansing
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Pack, J.) Case for injuries received by reason of a defective crosswalk. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for a personal injury alleged to have been caused by the neglect of defendant in not keeping a cross-walk in repair. An objection is raised by the defendant which goes to the plaintiff’s right of action, although not affecting her cause of action, which, if disposed of in favor of the defendant, will suspend further proceedings in this suit, and render it unnecessary to-pass upon other questions raised by the record.
The charter of the city of Lansing contains the following provision:
“ The council shall audit and allow all accounts chargeable against…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Fulton Bank v. New-York & Sharon Canal Co.New York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Maguire v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- National Security Bank v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Merkle v. Township of BenningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- De Haan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- McEvoy v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Carson v. City of GeneseeIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.