Legal Opinion

Wolverton v. Village of Saranac

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1912No. Docket No. 160PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Case by Bessie A. Wolverton against the village of Saranac for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

On November 1, 1908, Bessie Wolverton, the plaintiff, was living with her husband in the defendant village. Late in the evening of that day they were informed that her husband’s mother was dying. They hurriedly dressed and started for the mother’s house, half a mile distant. When they had gone about half the distance, they came to a tar and gravel walk, in which were 10 holes of varying sizes, ranging from 6x7 inches to 36x 36 inches. The depth of them varied from 2 to 6 inches. The plaintiff and her husband were more or less familiar with the walk, and, as they approached the vicinity where…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowell v. Township of WatertownMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Schwingschlegl v. City of MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Urtel v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Belyea v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. O'Connor v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Cornell v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Jenks v. CareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Sherman v. Consumers' Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API