Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Lutes
Indiana Supreme Court
From the ^Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
In this case, appellee Lutes sued the appellant in a complaint of two paragraphs. In the first paragraph of his complaint, appellee sued to recover damages for an alleged breach by the appellant of a parol contract between the appellee and appellant for the driving of certain piles at two bridges, known as numbers 5 and 6, on the line of its railroad, in that the appellant, after such contract was made and entered into, refused to permit appellee to perform such work.
The second paragraph of complaint was a common count *277for work and labor done, materials furnished, and money laid out and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Devlin v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Hamilton v. . McPhersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Costigan v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail-RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Stanley v. SutherlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hamilton v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. Engine v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Williams v. ChapmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Lake County Title Company v. Root Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Britton v. State ex rel. RoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.