Legal Opinion

Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. Engine v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1898No. 2,633PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Prom the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Appellant brought suit against appellees on a promissory note executed by the appel*234lees as part payment for a threshing outfit, consisting of traction engine, separator, and necessary appurtenances, purchased of the Upton Manufacturing Company, which note was afterwards, for value and before maturity assigned to appellant. Appellees answered in general denial, and also an answer of warranty and breach thereof. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict for appellees.

The first assignment of error, “sustaining defendants’ motion to suppress parts of plaintiff’s deposition to which the plaintiff at…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, & Chicago Railway Co. v. RubyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor of the World v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Freeze v. DePuyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. WorrellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance v. JackmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Green v. EdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Huber Manufacturing Co. v. BlessingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Marion Manufacturing Co. v. HardingIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API