Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Love
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1899No. 17,063PublishedCited by 46 opinions
Prom the Vigo Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.
Action by appellee for damages for breach of executory contract for employment.
The alleged breach consisted in the wrongful discharge of appellee while the contract had one year and eight months to run, for which time he would have been entitled at the contract rate to $3,600, payable in monthly installments. Verdict and judgment for appellee.
The overruling of the demurrer to the complaint, and the giving of certain instructions, are the errors complained of. The specific objections to the complaint are that “it does not allege damages,” and that “it fails to show that appellee could not,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Schell v. . PlumbNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Olmstead v. BachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Hinchcliffe v. KoontzIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Thomas Henry Carter v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- SECO CHEMICALS, INC., ETC. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Salem Community School Corp. v. RichmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.