Legal Opinion

United States v. Fairfield Gloves

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 21, 1977No. C.A.D. 1194; No. 77-6PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States Customs Court in Fairfield Gloves et al. v. United States, 77 Cust. Ct. —, C.R.D. 76-10 (1976), upholding the validity of Rule 3.2(b) of the Customs Court1 and ordering that the date of filing shown on summonses in five actions be corrected to show filing as of the date of their postmark. Noting that a controlling question of law was involved, the court also granted an interlocutory order for the Government to apply for an appeal to this court pursuant to 28 USC 1541(b). The Government’s petition for leave to appeal was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Canadian Aviator, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. BoeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  5. S. Stern & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. M.A. Mortenson Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Belfont Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. Pollak Import-Export Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Eddietron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API