Legal Opinion
Belfont Sales Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 11, 1988No. Court 81-12-01724-SPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
AQUILINO, Judge:
Entry of judgment in this case in accordance with the court’s slip op. 87-90, 11 CIT -, 666 F.Supp. 1568 (1987), has spawned four related motions by the defendant, the primary one of which prays for “modification and amendment of the judgment ... and for reconsideration and/or rehearing or retrial.”
I
Slip op. 87-90, familiarity with which is presumed herein, set forth the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law after trial, including a finding that a quartz analogue watch or “QAW” does contain a watch movement, when viewed in the light of Texas…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Union Camp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Penrod Drilling Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- D & M Watch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Retamal v. United States Customs & Border Protection, Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.