United States v. Lombardo
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. The facts, which involve the construction and application of § 6 of the White Slave Traffic Act, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Error under the Criminal Appeals Act (March 2, 1907, c. 2564, 34 Stat. 1246) to review a decision of the District Court for the Western District of Washington (228 Fed. Rep. 980) sustaining a demurrer to an indictment founded on the “White Slave Traffic Act’' (June 25, 1910, c. 395, 36 Stat. 825, 826).
Section 6 of that act provides that every one “who shall keep, maintain, control, support or harbor in any house or place, for the purpose of prostitution, . . . any alien woman . . . within three years after she shall have entered the United States . . . shall file with the Commissioner General…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wescott v. EcclesUtah Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by359 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Rodriguez-MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
354 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.