Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Eddietron, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 16, 1980No. C.D. 4853; Court 79-2-00306PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff, an importer of golf carts from Poland, sues to recover certain dumping duties assessed on seven protested entries covered by this action. Defendant, alleging lack of jurisdiction, moves to dismiss the action upon the grounds that it was not timely commenced, and that the liquidated duties were not paid at the time it was filed.

Essentially, the following three questions are presented by defendant’s motion to dismiss:

1. Is an action timely commenced when the summons is mailed within, but not received until after, the one hundred and eighty days prescribed in 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Don E. Williams Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Air-Sea Brokers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. Texas Mex Brick & Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  4. United States v. Novelty Imports, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  5. United States v. Fairfield GlovesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nature's Farm Products, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Dynasty Footwear v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  3. Bar Bea Truck Leasing Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  4. E & S Express Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  5. Juarez v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API