Legal Opinion

Hamilton and High, LLC v. City of Palo Alto

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 2023No. H049425Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/20/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HAMILTON AND HIGH, LLC, et al., H049425 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 20CV366967) v. CITY OF PALO ALTO, et al., Defendants and Respondents. In this appeal, we consider the application of the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, § 66000 et seq. 1 (Act)) to the City of Palo Alto (City or Palo Alto)’s refusal to refund “in- lieu parking fees” to plaintiffs, developers who paid the fees years earlier as a condition of approval of a building project.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API