Legal Opinion
Jarvis v. Webber
California Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1925No. Docket No. Sac. 3504PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
The appellant brought an action against the respondent, as sheriff of Butte County, for the recovery of personal property ‘seized under attachment and sold on execution. Judgment was entered for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.
The action in which the attachment was issued was brought by the Commercial Bank of Durham against W. A. D ’Egilbert and the Western Rice Growers, Inc. It appears that D’Egilbert, the Western Rice Growers, Inc., and Western Warehouses, Inc., were associated in rice culture in Northern California in the year 1920, D ’Egilbert owning a controlling interest…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hassell v. BungeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Cadwell's Bank v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- May v. TenneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Brown v. . GuthrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Dana v. StanfordsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Peterson v. BallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bumb v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Brainard v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.