Sabichi v. Chase
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
From the agreed statements of facts on which this case was submitted in the court below it appears that G-. A. Clark and C. H. Humphreys, partners, engaged in business at the city of Los Angeles under the firm name of Clark & Humphreys, being in failing circumstances, both as individuals and as a partnership, entered into a written contract of date December 15,1892, with the plaintiffs Sabichi, Minor and Holt, as trustees, and ten named creditors of Clark & Humphreys, by the terms of which contract Clark and Humphreys agreed to convey all their property, partnership and individual,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cadwell's Bank v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- May v. TenneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Brown v. . GuthrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Dana v. StanfordsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Priest v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Bumb v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Jarvis v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Rapp v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Garn v. ThorwaldsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.