Legal Opinion

Holasek v. Village of Medina

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1975No. 44839PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

In a declaratory judgment action, the trial court concluded that the defendant village council’s denial of plaintiffs’ application for a special-use permit for the construction of a mobile home park was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable, and ordered defendant village of Medina to issue the special-use permit. Defendants appeal from the order denying their blended post-trial motion. Since the evidence amply sustains the trial court’s findings and conclusion of arbitrary denial, and the zoning ordinance authorizes the use of plaintiffs’ land for a mobile home park, we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Donohue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Sun Oil Company v. Village of New HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Rochester Ass'n of Neighborhoods v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. City of Duluth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC v. Osage County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. Littlefield v. City Of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API