Holasek v. Village of Medina
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
In a declaratory judgment action, the trial court concluded that the defendant village council’s denial of plaintiffs’ application for a special-use permit for the construction of a mobile home park was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable, and ordered defendant village of Medina to issue the special-use permit. Defendants appeal from the order denying their blended post-trial motion. Since the evidence amply sustains the trial court’s findings and conclusion of arbitrary denial, and the zoning ordinance authorizes the use of plaintiffs’ land for a mobile home park, we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Donohue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Sun Oil Company v. Village of New HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Rochester Ass'n of Neighborhoods v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- City of Duluth v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC v. Osage County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Littlefield v. City Of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.