Inland Construction Co. v. City of Bloomington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellants, Inland Construction Company and Marvin H. Anderson Construction Company, brought this action seeking either to compel the city of Bloomington to issue a permit allowing Inland to construct a shopping center or to obtain a judicial determination that Inland can construct the center without such permit. The district court vacated a previously issued writ of mandamus and denied all relief except for its determination that Inland was entitled to a permit for construction of a “neighborhood” shopping center as opposed to a “regional” or “community” shopping…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Verona, Inc. v. Mayor and Council of Borough of West CaldwellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Olsen v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Golden v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
3Cited by22 opinions
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Rochester Ass'n of Neighborhoods v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Corwine v. Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.