Legal Opinion

Inland Construction Co. v. City of Bloomington

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1972No. 42883PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Inland Construction Company and Marvin H. Anderson Construction Company, brought this action seeking either to compel the city of Bloomington to issue a permit allowing Inland to construct a shopping center or to obtain a judicial determination that Inland can construct the center without such permit. The district court vacated a previously issued writ of mandamus and denied all relief except for its determination that Inland was entitled to a permit for construction of a “neighborhood” shopping center as opposed to a “regional” or “community” shopping…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Verona, Inc. v. Mayor and Council of Borough of West CaldwellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. Olsen v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Golden v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Rochester Ass'n of Neighborhoods v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Corwine v. Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API