CROSBY BY CROSBY v. Sultz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
Once again, this Court is confronted with a recurring issue of far-reaching importance, to wit, whether a physician may be held liable for the actions of his patient, which resulted in injury to third party victims. Here, we are not presented squarely with a “duty to warn” situation. Rather, we must decide if a cause of action may be sustained against a doctor where the doctor failed to monitor his patient’s conduct. After a comprehensive review of the law in Pennsylvania and other states, as well as consideration of the facts before us, we hold that a doctor has no duty to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Mazzagatti v. Everingham by EveringhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Alumni Ass'n v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Zimmerman v. O'BANNONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Gordon v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Estate of Witthoeft v. KiskaddonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Troxel v. A.I. duPont InstituteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Roth Cash Register Co. v. Micro Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Donnelly v. BauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Ford v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.