Legal Opinion

Ford v. Ford

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLally-Green, J.

¶ 1 Appellants, William K. Ford (“Bill”), individually and as president of Riverview Golf Course, Inc., and Riverview Golf Course, a closely held corporation (“River-view” or “the corporation”), appeal from the order entered on June 7, 2004. The trial court found that Bill acted oppressively toward minority shareholders by engaging in self-dealing and by excluding the minority from any benefits of Riverview. We affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court set forth the facts of the case as follows:

Riverview Golf Course, Inc. (“River-view” or “the corporation”), a Pennsylvania corporation incorporated in 1961,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily NewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. In Re the Judicial Dissolution of Kemp & Beatley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Viener v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Kenis v. Perini Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Kessler v. BroderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. John R. Baur v. Baur Farms, Inc. and Robert F. BaurSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. Greco v. Myers Coach Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Nedler v. VaisbergDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Carolyn Ahrens, Substituted for Richard Ahrens v. Ahrens Agricultural Industries Co., A/K/A Miraco and B. Carter Thomson, and Mike Witt and Susan WittCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API