Legal Opinion
Troxel v. A.I. duPont Institute
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 4, 1994No. 2689, 2690, and 2759PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this medical malpractice action against Pennsylvania and Delaware health care providers, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of A.I. duPont Institute, a Delaware hospital. The plaintiffs and the Pennsylvania health care providers have appealed. After careful review of the complex issues in this appeal, we affirm.
On October 30, 1987, Mary Siple, a non-party, gave birth to a female child, Ashley. Because Ashley was born with microcephaly 1 and a pes cavus deformity of the leg, 2 she was taken for treatment to Ches-Penn Health Services, Inc., a Pennsylvania medical…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- CIPOLLA v. ShaposkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Tooker v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Elizabeth F. Shuder and Robert J. Shuder v. McDonald Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Huber v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Stange, T. v. Janssen PharmaceuticalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Michael Kirschbaum Helen Kirschbaum v. Wrgsb Associates D/B/A Gsb Building the Balcor Company v. Insignia Commercial Group Wrgsb Associates the Balcor Company, in 00-1017 Insignia Commercial Group, in 00-1023Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Bolieu v. Sisters of Providence in WashingtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Cruet v. Certain-Teed Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.