Legal Opinion
Zimmerman v. O'BANNON
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 11, 1982No. 103 Misc. Docket 1981PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Justice.
This appeal requires an interpretation of the Attorney General’s right to stay the promulgation of a proposed rule *553or regulation under Section 204(b) of the Commonwealth Attorneys Act (Act), Act of October 15, 1980, P.L. 950, No. 164, § 101, 71 P.S. § 732-101 et seq. The Department of Public Welfare (DPW) prepared a personal care boarding home plan and implementing regulations, and submitted them to the office of Attorney General for review pursuant to Section 204(b) of the Act. The Attorney General’s office, after study, concluded that the plan and regulations authorizing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- National Transit Co. v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Sterling v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. McHughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- McConnaughey v. Building Components, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. WootenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.