Legal Opinion

California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Frerichs

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1999No. C031512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action for declaratory relief brought by plaintiff California Casualty Indemnity Exchange (California Casualty) concerning the interpretation of a policy of homeowners insurance.

The defendant was injured by Paul Hudson (Hudson), the adult son of the homeowners, the named insureds on a policy issued by California Casualty. At issue is whether Hudson is also an insured for purpose of the coverage clause of the policy. The judgment declares that Hudson, who was house-sitting during his parents’ vacation, is a “resident[] of [their]…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Entin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Reshamwalla v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2000
  3. Signature Network Inc. v. EstefanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API