Legal Opinion

Signature Network Inc. v. Estefan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2006No. 04-16579Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Signature Network appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Estefan defendants. Signature argues that Estefan owes them more than $400,000 for breaching their merchandising agreement. Signature argues that, at a minimum, the contract is ambiguous, so summary judgment cannot be awarded because the interpretation of an ambiguous contract is a question of fact.1

We are satisfied that the contract is not ambiguous. What is central here is the meaning of the word “hereunder” in Paragraph 7 of the Amendment. The word “hereunder” refers only to the unre*655couped…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. FrerichsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API