Signature Network Inc. v. Estefan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Signature Network appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Estefan defendants. Signature argues that Estefan owes them more than $400,000 for breaching their merchandising agreement. Signature argues that, at a minimum, the contract is ambiguous, so summary judgment cannot be awarded because the interpretation of an ambiguous contract is a question of fact.1
We are satisfied that the contract is not ambiguous. What is central here is the meaning of the word “hereunder” in Paragraph 7 of the Amendment. The word “hereunder” refers only to the unre*655couped…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wolf v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. FrerichsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999