Legal Opinion

Reshamwalla v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 1, 2000No. CIV.S-99-2129 FCD/JFPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAMRELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Hussein Ali and Raheda Resh-amwalla (“plaintiffs”) bring this action against defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) alleging that State Farm breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing by refusing to defend and indemnify Darrel Abruzzo (“Abruzzo”) in an underlying action by plaintiffs against Abruzzo. Plaintiffs bring these claims as assignees of Abruzzo’s rights under a homeowner’s insurance poli cy issued by State Farm. Plaintiffs also bring a direct action against State Farm as judgment creditors…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGrath v. Everest National InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  2. Scheffler v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  3. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Kinsale Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API