Legal Opinion
Entin v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 20, 2012No. B239642PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZELON, J.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Allen M. Entin owned two disability income insurance policies. In 2009, Entin filed a claim asserting that migraine headaches had rendered him totally disabled. Entin’s insurer, respondent Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, agreed to pay Entin benefits while investigating his claim. At the conclusion of its investigation, Provident filed a declaratory relief action seeking a determination that Entin was not totally disabled *774within the meaning of his policies. The complaint clarified that Provident would continue to pay Entin benefits during…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Thomas M. Germain, Trustee for the Estate of O'sullivan's Fuel Oil Co., Inc. v. The Connecticut National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eith v. KetelhutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Eith v. KetelhutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- SLPR, LLC v. Superior Court CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- United States Liability Ins. Co. v. JohnstonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021