Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 15, 1973No. 1015-1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

This is an action to quiet a title claimed to have been acquired by adverse possession. Three major matters are raised: the criteria for ruling on a motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, objections to the trial court’s findings and objections to the conclusions regarding adverse possession.

Plaintiff acquired title by deed to that parcel marked “A” on the map. Title was acquired in 1957 after the plaintiff had leased this residential property for a year. She has lived since in a house on the property. In November 1968, she filed a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Richards v. KuppingerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. N. Fiorito Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Peoples Savings Bank v. Frank BuffordWashington Supreme Court · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Anderson v. HudakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Lingvall v. BartmessCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API