Legal Opinion

N. Fiorito Co. v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1966No. 37780PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Appellant (plaintiff) a heavy construction contractor, commenced this action against respondent, the State of Washington, seeking to recover added expenses and penalties incurred due to delay in completion of a highway construction contract. Trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. At the conclusion of appellant’s case, the trial court granted respondent’s motion for an involuntary nonsuit, and thereafter entered findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment dismissing appellant’s action. This appeal followed.

The crucial and decisive issue in this case is factual. Appellant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richards v. KuppingerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Mattieligh v. PoeWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. O'BRIEN v. SchultzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Schmidt v. Pioneer United DairiesWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hodges v. GronvoldWashington Supreme Court · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Maynard Inv. Co., Inc. v. McCannWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Schermer v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Dependency of SchermerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Brewer v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Jones Associates, Inc. v. Eastside Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API