Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Castillo v. Clark

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 15, 1994No. 76506PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION

PRICE, Judge.

Relator Rafael Castillo requests a permanent writ prohibiting the Honorable Thomas C. Clark from ordering the production of his treating physician’s report under Rule 60.01.1 Relator contends that the Rule encompasses only examining physicians, and that treating physicians are excluded. We hold that Rule 60.01 includes both treating and examining physicians within its scope. The preliminary writ is quashed.

I

Relator Rafael Castillo and Eloise Brown were in an automobile accident in which Castillo was injured. Following the accident, Castillo…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Plank v. KoehrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Owen v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. McCloud v. SeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Gibson v. KennedySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Cash v. BolleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Transit Casualty Co. v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. Goede v. Aerojet General Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Stevenett v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  4. Betty Pisoni v. Steak 'N Shake Operations, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Stephen J. Hale v. Cottrell, Inc., Auto Handling Corporation and Pacific Motor Trucking CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API