Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine Company
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Plaintiff was injured while feeding fiberboard into a sanding machine during his employment with Pope and Talbot, a wood products manufacturer. The sanding machine had been purchased by Pope and Talbot from defendant. Plaintiff brought this action on a products liability theory, contending the sanding machine was unreasonably dangerous by virtue of defective design. At the completion of the testimony, defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was granted and plaintiff appealed.
As is required in such a situation, the evidence is recounted in a manner most favorable to the plaintiff. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Dorsey v. Yoder CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Jones v. Hutchinson Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Blevins v. Cushman MotorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.