Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1974PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff was injured while feeding fiberboard into a sanding machine during his employment with Pope and Talbot, a wood products manufacturer. The sanding machine had been purchased by Pope and Talbot from defendant. Plaintiff brought this action on a products liability theory, contending the sanding machine was unreasonably dangerous by virtue of defective design. At the completion of the testimony, defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was granted and plaintiff appealed.

As is required in such a situation, the evidence is recounted in a manner most favorable to the plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Dorsey v. Yoder CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Jones v. Hutchinson Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Blevins v. Cushman MotorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API