Legal Opinion

Wood v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1984No. A8011-06274, A8108-05215; A8109-05922; CA A25137PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

This is an action for personal injuries which the trial court consolidated with companion cases for property damage and loss of consortium. The consolidated cases are before us on remand from the Supreme Court after resolution of a jurisdictional issue. Wood v. Ford Motor Co. et al, 296 Or 711, 678 P2d 267 (1984). Plaintiff appeals from a judgment granting summary judgment to defendants Ford Motor Company (Ford) and Rancho Ford, Inc. (Rancho), a Ford dealer. She argues that summary judgment was improperly granted, because the pleadings and affidavits establish a genuine issue of fact. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Wilson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Wilson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glover v. Bic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Heidtke v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. McKenzie v. A. W. Chesterson Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Haase v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API