Legal Opinion

Chancler v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1985No. 15938PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

HISTORY

This is a declaratory judgment action in which plaintiffs-appellants, Stevon Christensen and Denny Chancier, have requested a judicial determination of insurance coverage provided by the defendant-respondent, American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.

The facts of this case are undisputed. On May 1, 1980, Christensen suffered severe and permanently debilitating injuries when a crane sold by Chancier collapsed on him as he was operating it. The crane sold by Chancier was a used crane, and before selling it, Chancier had modified it by adding a ten-foot extension to the boom.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Utica Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API