Legal Opinion

Overton v. Harband

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1935No. Civ. 5329PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RANKIN, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendants, Title Insurance and Trust Company, and Mortgage Guarantee Company, from a judgment decreeing a trust deed executed in the name of one Henry Schwartz, and conveying certain real property described therein, to Title Insurance & Trust Company, as trustee, and naming Mortgage Guarantee Company as beneficiary, to be null and void, and restraining appellants from asserting any rights thereunder.

The material facts bearing upon the questions raised by the appeal are as follows:

Respondents, Joseph Overton and Eliza A. Overton, are husband and wife,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Emery v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kroplin v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Andre Flowers v. DancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Hobbs v. Transport Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Shuster v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Shafford v. Otto Sales Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API