Legal Opinion

Emery v. Kipp

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1908No. L.A. No. 2089PublishedCited by 35 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order refusing a new trial. N. H. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to quiet title to lands situate in the county of San Diego. She obtained judgment, and from that judgment and from the order of the court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial he appeals.

Upon the trial the following facts were established without conflict: The maiden name of plaintiff, who is an English woman by birtb, is Madeline Louisa Munro. In England she was usually called Louisa. After coming to California she was usually called Madeline by her friends and family, although she was sometimes addressed and spoken of as Louisa. In 1888 one Phipson, the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Rue v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Freeman v. HawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Everett v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Petition of HauptlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. McWhorter v. McWhorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API