Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Transport Motor Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1943No. S. F. 16912PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiffs brought separate actions against the owner and driver of a borrowed ear for damages resulting from injuries sustained when the borrowed car collided with the ear in which the plaintiffs were riding. The actions were consolidated for trial before a jury. In the action by Prank W. Hobbs, the jury returned a verdict against the driver in the sum of $10,000 and against the owner in the statutory amount of $5,000. In each of the other actions the verdict was for $1,000 against both defendants. The owner, Transport Motor Company, appealed from the judgments on the several verdicts.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Henrietta v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Milgate v. WraithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bayless v. MullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Exchange Casualty & Surety Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Home Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Steele v. NagelIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Leplat v. Raley Wiles Auto SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API