Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Swedish Imports Maintenance, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1987No. 363A86PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

In this workers’ compensation case we must determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly affirmed the Industrial Commission’s decision that: (1) claimant had suffered a change in condition entitling him to recover pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 97-47, and (2) claimant was entitled to compensation for permanent partial disability pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 97-30. For the reasons stated herein, we find that: (1) claimant is entitled to an award for change in condition pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 97-47, (2) claimant is entitled to compensation under N.C.G.S. § 97-29 rather than N.C.G.S. § 97-30…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Pantry, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Pittman v. Thomas & HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Lewis v. Craven Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Blair v. American Television & Communications Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Errante v. Cumberland County Solid Waste ManagementCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API