Legal Opinion
Pittman v. Thomas & Howard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided April 2, 1996No. 9410IC663PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Plaintiff William Pittman appeals an Opinion and Award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (the Commission) denying his claims for additional compensation and further medical treatment. He contends the Commission erred by: (1) concluding that one deputy commissioner possesses no authority to modify the previous order of another commissioner; and (2) failing to find that his current condition was attributable to a previous compensable injury. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the decision of the Commission.
Pertinent facts and procedural information are as follows:…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Parsons v. Pantry, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Perez v. American Airlines/AMR Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Moore v. Standard Mineral Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Reinninger v. Prestige Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Creel v. Town of DoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.